Coordinate sub-agents to monitor PRs and fix prod bugs
A Cursor Projects coordinator agent delegates to sub-agents, watches new PRs and production bugs, spins up agents to fix issues, and surfaces questions to the user.
Claude computer use produced 70 files for a planned feature but the code didn't work, so the author went back to manual work.
Claude computer use produced 70 files for a planned feature but the code didn't work, so the author went back to manual work.
The user discussed the feature deliverables and agreed on a concrete plan with Claude, then granted it full autonomous control to implement the entire feature. Claude generated 70 files on its own without further input or tests. The user reviewed the output afterward.
The code did not work. The user deleted the branch, cleared the session, and returned to using Claude only for incremental pair-programming steps.
The full autonomous run produced unusable output after the agreed plan, prompting immediate abandonment.
In my repo at [repo path], implement this feature: [feature description]. First write a short plan and the list of files you'll change, and wait for my okay. Then build it in small steps, running the tests after each step. Stop when the tests pass and I can run [command] to see it working, and don't delete files without asking.
A Cursor Projects coordinator agent delegates to sub-agents, watches new PRs and production bugs, spins up agents to fix issues, and surfaces questions to the user.
Ran a Cursor agent continuously for 24 hours to build a project management tool; the app fully works but is not production ready.
The author had ChatGPT take the Session Buddy extension source from Chrome, port it to Safari and install it, taking about 20 minutes.