Skip to content
agentusehub

Draft pull request reviews for you to edit and send

The poster built a review inbox where Claude Code drafts reviews for piled-up PRs and the user can discuss, rewrite or delete findings before sending.

Time saved
Not reported
Setup time
Not reported
Running cost
Not reported
Cost range
Not reported

Use case overview

The poster built a review inbox where Claude Code drafts reviews for piled-up PRs and the user can discuss, rewrite or delete findings before sending.

Reported experience

  1. What they did

    The poster built Cerber to watch GitHub for pull requests requesting their review, run Claude Code through the user’s existing CLI login, and prepare draft reviews in a local web UI. The agent produces a summary, change walkthrough, and proposed inline comments; the user can discuss findings with it, rewrite or delete comments, then manually send the review from their own account.

  2. How it went

    It helped with a queue that had grown to 15 PRs and avoided unreviewed AI comments being posted straight to GitHub. It still depends on sending code to Anthropic, requires a paid Claude Code subscription, and only auto-sends approvals if you opt in and they meet a confidence threshold.

  3. Worth knowing

    By default, review drafts and state stay on your machine, command execution is read-only unless you explicitly trust the author or org, and sending remains manual.

Example prompts

Try with Claude Code
Look at the open pull requests in [repo] that are waiting for my review. For each, read the diff and draft a review with specific findings, ordered by importance, and save them to [file or folder] for me to edit. Do not post comments or approve anything; I'll review and send them myself. Finish once every PR has a draft.
Software & DevOps

Port a Chrome extension to Safari

The author had ChatGPT take the Session Buddy extension source from Chrome, port it to Safari and install it, taking about 20 minutes.

ChatGPT