Coordinate sub-agents to monitor PRs and fix prod bugs
A Cursor Projects coordinator agent delegates to sub-agents, watches new PRs and production bugs, spins up agents to fix issues, and surfaces questions to the user.
Scout runs a linter, fixes a syntax error, re-runs it, reviews staged changes, writes a commit message and pushes to a new branch, shown as a walkthrough.
Scout runs a linter, fixes a syntax error, re-runs it, reviews staged changes, writes a commit message and pushes to a new branch, shown as a walkthrough.
Scout connects to the local terminal through an MCP bridge and works only inside a workspace folder you set. It ran a linter, read the output, opened the file to fix a syntax error and re-ran the linter. For Git, it ran git status and git diff, wrote a conventional commit message, created the branch and pushed. By default you click to confirm each command.
The article describes the workflow as a walkthrough and gives no measured results, timings or failure cases. It states that the lint-fix loop and the commit-and-push flow work as described.
Scout needs an enterprise setup: Frontier preview enrollment, an Intune policy, and both Microsoft 365 Copilot and GitHub Copilot Business or Enterprise licenses. Personal accounts won't work.
In my project at [path to repo], run [linter command] and fix any errors it reports, then re-run it until it passes. Review the staged changes and draft a clear commit message, then pause and show me the diff and message before you commit. After I approve, commit and push to a new branch named [branch name].
A Cursor Projects coordinator agent delegates to sub-agents, watches new PRs and production bugs, spins up agents to fix issues, and surfaces questions to the user.
Ran a Cursor agent continuously for 24 hours to build a project management tool; the app fully works but is not production ready.
The author had ChatGPT take the Session Buddy extension source from Chrome, port it to Safari and install it, taking about 20 minutes.