Spend leftover AI quota on reviewable PRs
RemainderBot uses a founder's goals and task lists to write PRs with spare Claude and Codex quota, producing 111 PRs including call prep and prototypes.
A Codex agent resolved an issue passed to it in about 40 minutes, and an ops agent verified the fix back in Slack.
A Codex agent resolved an issue passed to it in about 40 minutes, and an ops agent verified the fix back in Slack.
An internal ops agent called “claw” triaged an issue reported in Slack. A person then handed the issue to a Codex agent, which worked independently to resolve it. The ops agent later posted verification of the fix back into the same Slack thread.
The Codex agent resolved the issue after 40 minutes, with the ops agent confirming success in Slack. No shortfalls or additional metrics are stated.
Relies on internal purpose-built “claw” ops agent tied to Slack; took 40 minutes end-to-end.
Here is an issue from my team: [paste issue text or link] in the repo at [repo path or URL]. Find the cause, make the fix, run the tests, and open a pull request with a short summary of what changed and how you checked it. You're done when tests pass and the summary is ready for me to review. Don't merge or deploy anything, and pause to show me the diff before pushing.
RemainderBot uses a founder's goals and task lists to write PRs with spare Claude and Codex quota, producing 111 PRs including call prep and prototypes.
A Cursor Projects coordinator agent delegates to sub-agents, watches new PRs and production bugs, spins up agents to fix issues, and surfaces questions to the user.
Ran a Cursor agent continuously for 24 hours to build a project management tool; the app fully works but is not production ready.