Coordinate sub-agents to monitor PRs and fix prod bugs
A Cursor Projects coordinator agent delegates to sub-agents, watches new PRs and production bugs, spins up agents to fix issues, and surfaces questions to the user.
A Hermes tutorial reads a PR diff and returns a structured review of bugs, security and code quality, then turns it into a skill that watches repos and sends summaries.
A Hermes tutorial reads a PR diff and returns a structured review of bugs, security and code quality, then turns it into a skill that watches repos and sends summaries.
With the gh CLI authenticated and the Hermes gateway running, you first ask Hermes in chat to fetch a PR diff and review it. You then add a code-review skill with a severity-based output format, and teach it team conventions through memory. A cron job runs every 2 hours, reviews recent PRs in the listed repos, and delivers a summary to Telegram.
The source gives no review results. It says the skill and remembered conventions make reviews less generic, and estimates 3-5 GitHub API requests per PR review.
Reviews posted back to GitHub appear under whichever account gh is authenticated as, and that token needs repo scope.
Review the pull request at [PR URL] and return a structured report with sections for bugs, security issues, and code quality, each with file and line references and a severity. Then turn this into a reusable routine that checks [repo name] for new PRs every [interval] and sends me a short summary. Show me the routine and wait for approval before posting any comments on GitHub.
A Cursor Projects coordinator agent delegates to sub-agents, watches new PRs and production bugs, spins up agents to fix issues, and surfaces questions to the user.
Ran a Cursor agent continuously for 24 hours to build a project management tool; the app fully works but is not production ready.
The author had ChatGPT take the Session Buddy extension source from Chrome, port it to Safari and install it, taking about 20 minutes.