Review a landlord deposit dispute for legal violations
A tenant used ChatGPT and Gemini to review a landlord's apartment deposit dispute, identify legal violations, and avoid losing $4,200.
Poster ran four AI models on a weekday pre-market prompt to trade $1,000 portfolios each for nine weeks; ChatGPT came out ahead.
Poster ran four AI models on a weekday pre-market prompt to trade $1,000 portfolios each for nine weeks; ChatGPT came out ahead.
The poster set up four paper-trading portfolios with $1,000 each on Alpaca and ran the same weekday pre-market prompt against ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity with Deep Research enabled. Each model could only return BUY, SELL, HOLD, or CANCEL, the trading flow was automated in Python and logged publicly, and the poster says they did not override any decisions.
After nine weeks, ChatGPT led at +21.1%, helped by healthcare picks including IOVA doubling and ACHC rising 52%. Perplexity was +1.1%, Gemini -6.6%, Claude -11.5%, and the poster stressed it was paper money and too early to trust blindly.
One practical catch from the thread is that ChatGPT sat entirely in cash for almost three weeks before making trades, so the system may do nothing for long stretches.
Every weekday before the market opens, review a paper-trading portfolio of $[1000] and suggest trades based on [your strategy or risk level], using only simulated money. Record each decision with a one-sentence reason and the portfolio value in a running log. After [number] weeks, summarize performance against [benchmark, e.g. S&P 500]. Do not place any real orders; show me any proposed trade for approval first.
A tenant used ChatGPT and Gemini to review a landlord's apartment deposit dispute, identify legal violations, and avoid losing $4,200.
The poster used an AI assistant to summarize a denial PDF to draft an appeal, but it invented an appeal deadline.
Poster used Claude over a weekend to plan and build a self-hosted app that organizes receipts for an accountant and replaces paid bookkeeping software.